Oct 16 2007

Blood Sugar Chi Magik

Recently on the SGU podcast we have discussed the martial arts masters who claim they can use chi, the mysterious undetectable life force of Eastern mysticism, to make themselves invulnerable to blows or to knock out opponents without even touching them. It’s all very impressive – in that it is an amazing demonstration of the power of suggestion and self-deception.

Belief in chi is also telling us something about human psychology. That there is a psychological motivation to believe in the magic of chi does not mean that chi is a fiction, but since we can say scientifically from independent lines of evidence that there is no credible evidence for the existence of anything like chi or any life energy, that does lead to the question of why people believe in it.

SGU listener, Matt Snodgrass, wrote us an e-mail saying the following:

I understand how people fall for a lot of the junk that’s out there, as I said I’ve tried some of it, and gone into more depth with things like the herbal concoctions. The only real way of advancing in martial arts though, is hard work. It’s like dieting in many ways, those who I’ve ever seen that become very good do so by make lifestyle changes such as going to the gym regularly, practicing drills and fighting moves constantly, keeping up on the cardiovascular training, etc. This becomes tedious to many people though, and the magic becomes very alluring, much like fad diets.

I think Matt is exactly correct, and his analogy is very apt. Belief in magic in many forms is about wanting an easy solution to life’s problems. Numerous industries exist solely to peddle easy or magical answers to complex problems. Easy answers sell well.

We see this clearly with weight loss. Changing one’s habits to limit caloric intake and increase exercise is hard work. What people want is to lose weight without diet or exercise, and so almost weekly we are promised a new miracle solution, a secret to accomplish just that.

And speaking of secrets, the recent self-help book, The Secret, is another manifestation of the exact same thing – the desire for easy answers. The Secret is, in a way, a perfectly marketed example of this phenomenon. It promises that all of life’s problems can be fixed just by wishing it so. Believe and your belief will become manifest, the universe will listen. It’s an all purpose easy answer. It also includes another component – that you have to take some specific action to cause the desired result to come about. This is slick – wish for an outcome, then do something to create the outcome, and the outcome will manifest. Of course, you could skip the whole wishing part, but that’s the marketing genius of the book. They are selling the wishing, the magic, the illusion of an easy answer.

Self-help and pop psychology books in general fall into the wish-fulfillment and easy answer genre. By and large such books claim to distill all of human psychological complexity down to one easy system. The simple system can then be applied to you to create simple steps to achieve whatever your goals happen to be.

With regard to martial arts (and in other examples) I think there are two phenomena at work. Certainly there is the desire for the easier or simpler path to prowess, denying the more unforgiving reality that there is no substitution for sustained hard work. But many martial artists who believe in the magic of chi also put in the hours of hard physical work. In these cases I think the draw is more for personal empowerment – the typical male power fantasy.

Belief in chi creates the possibility of going beyond martial arts skills to actual super powers. There is definitely something very seductive about the possibility of making an opponent collapse just by gesturing at them. It’s why Jedi are so cool, and it’s a major driver of the video-game industry.

What I am discussing are the psychological motivations that drive belief in chi and other magical nonsense. How people deceive themselves into believing chi is real is a separate question, perhaps for another post (although I have certainly discussed components of self deception in many previous posts).

Watching a chi master, after felling all his own students with the wave of a hand, getting the crap beat out of him by a martial artist free from such delusions, and watching a chi master cut his own arm with a sword, slicing himself down to the bone, should certainly serve as a cautionary experience. The lessons we should derive from their folly is to be knowledgeable of the mechanisms and power of self deception, be wary of reaching conclusions you really want to be true, be distrustful of easy answers to complex problems, and be aware of your own desires for super powers and therefore any claims that you can actually possess them.

Reality may be harsh but it has the distinct advantage of being real.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Print This Post Print This Post

10 responses so far

10 Responses to “Blood Sugar Chi Magik”

  1. Jim Shaveron 16 Oct 2007 at 12:04 pm

    Yeah, but YOU have super powers, right Steve?

  2. rbstansfieldon 16 Oct 2007 at 1:45 pm

    I imagine it’s like how kids think that your eyes work by shooting out sight rays. Attention is just another form of action, and uses a lot of the same frontal/cerebellar circuits. So just staring and “willing” something feels very similar to actually doing something. Since it feels that way, it’s easy to believe in telekinesis (in whatever guise).

    If it felt like magic, I imagine fewer people would believe in it. Magic implies a trick. But something that feels like a power but doesn’t show up in the science books implies a deeper wisdom that science hasn’t or can’t have dealt with. Homeopathy seems reasonable if you take its explanations on their own terms (Why can’t water have a “memory” for a substance just diluted out? A seat cushion has a “memory” for a person who just stood up). But I bet not just any random explanation will have that kind of intuitive appeal.

    I suppose these are empirical questions. Though it’s not obvious how to start testing them. As a medical education researcher and cognitive psychologist and (for a few months) listener to the SGttU podcast, I’m becoming interested in false health beliefs and their educational and policy ramifications.

  3. happy humaniston 16 Oct 2007 at 2:11 pm

    I liked this post (so much that I went from a lurker to a joiner!). It sums up what I believe about the lure of alternative medicine, as well.
    We all seek the easy way. If only…I could do something to stop this chronic pain, lose weight, whatever…
    Along comes the magician who offers a simple tool. It never does pan out, though.
    I grew up in the 70s, when people were talking about weird things. I thought that we would find Sasquatch, meet the aliens who have apparently been visiting us for years, and harness this magical power of acupuncture and alternative medicines. Diseases would be cured. Pain would vanish.
    As the years went on and nothing revolutionary emerged, I eventually woke up to cold, hard reality.
    Still the temptation is there. People reach for the fantastic first, and I don’t really know why it is. Help!

  4. jonny_ehon 16 Oct 2007 at 2:45 pm

    Both links point to the same video

  5. Steven Novellaon 16 Oct 2007 at 4:19 pm

    Thanks, the video links are fixed.

  6. jimon 17 Oct 2007 at 8:20 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM_qg5d1YGI

    this piece of video is a classic the skeptic is immune to the chi power, and the master comes up with all sorts of excuses for why it doesn’t work.

    here the chi fails to work on a reporter, so the master actually slaps her

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar1yXYOsxQk

    hope this helps to make the point.

  7. ellazimmon 18 Oct 2007 at 8:40 am

    From an evolutionary sense these clowns are not well adapted to their environment. Use the farce Luke! A thousand years ago they wouldn’t have been swimming in the gene pool for very long.

  8. ellazimmon 19 Oct 2007 at 8:07 am

    Thank you daedalus2u, I think you make some excellent points. There are societies where almost all warfare has become ritualised to the point of bluster and gesture; I’ve seen some footage of “war” in Papua New Guinea that is actually quite comical. And, as you point out, males that actually fight for females sometimes are themselves badly injured.

    Obviously I was mostly trying to be funny (needs work, I know) but there is an interesting topic in here: how do cultures combine and contrast ritualised play fighting with actual combat? I was initially thinking of Japan but England would do as well with it’s jousting. I think that gets to the crux of my argument (if there is one). Modes of combat that are actually ineffective against a real enemy end up with no support in the training/practise realm. This is not biological evolution, obviously, but after watching the linked videos I couldn’t help imagine one of those distance punchers going up against a real sword wielding opponent.

    As for as the appeal of sceptics go . . . maybe. Ghost hunters, homeopaths, dowsers, etc aren’t really status quo. Some girls just go for the rebels.